4.5 Article

Divergent structure of the ComQXPA quorum-sensing components: molecular basis of strain-specific communication mechanism in Bacillus subtilis

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 1159-1171

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02069.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Bacillus subtilis, the ComQXPA quorum-sensing system controls cell density-dependent phenotypes such as the production of degradative enzymes and antibiotics and the development of genetic competence. Bacillus subtilis (natto) NAF12, a mutant defective in poly-gamma-glutamate (gamma-PGA) production, was derived from B. subtilis (natto) NAF4 by Tn917-LTV1 insertional mutagenesis. Determination of the mutant DNA sequences flanking the Tn917-LTV1 insert revealed that the insertion had inactivated comP in this mutant, indicating that gamma-PGA synthesis in B. subtilis (natto) is under the control of the ComP-ComA signal transduction system. A comparison of the amino acid sequences revealed striking variation in the primary structures of ComQ (44% identity), ComX (26%) and the sensor domain of ComP (36%) between B, subtilis (natto) NAF4 and a. subtilis 168, In contrast, the amino acid and nucleotide sequences of the kinase domains of ComP and of the ComA response regulator share 95% and 100% identity respectively. The comP genes of NAF4 and 168 restored the impaired competence of B. subtilis BD1658 (comP::cat) and y-PGA production of B. subtilis (natto) NAF12 (comP::Tn917-LTV1) to only 15% of the level achieved by the respective parent comP genes. However, when introduced together with the cognate comQ and comX genes, the comP genes restored the relevant defect of the heterologous comP mutants nearly to wild-type levels. Analogous to the comCDE system of Streptococcus strains and the agrBCDE system of Staphylococcus aureus, the concerted variation in the comQXP genes appears to establish specific intercellular communication between B. subtilis strains sharing the same pheromone system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据