4.6 Article

A novel association between the human heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1) and prostate adenocarcinoma

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 156, 期 3, 页码 857-864

出版社

AMER SOC INVESTIGATIVE PATHOLOGY, INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64954-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [T32 CA009320, T32-CA09320, CA59705, R01 CA059705] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [T32 AI007078, T32-AI07078] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA059705, T32CA009320] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [T32AI007078] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A search for differentially expressed genes in a pair of nonmetastatic (PC-3) versus metastatic variant (PC-3M) human prostate carcinoma cell lines led to identification of the human heat shock factor (HSF1) as an overexpressed gene product in PC-3M tells. Analysis of primary prostate cancer specimens indicated that HSF1 is generally up-regulated in most of the malignant prostate epithelial cells relative to the normal prostate cells. Among the known effecters of HSF1 action, constitutive levels of HSP70 and HSP90 are not significantly altered by the naturally elevated expression of HSF1 as in PC-SM cells or by transduced overexpression of HSF1 in PC-3 cells. The basal levels of HSP27 in both cases are, however, consistently increased by two- to threefold. With respect to response to heat shock, high basal concentration of HSP90 is not further enhanced in these cells, and HSP70 is up-regulated irrespective of HSF1 level Heat shock, however, causes an increase in HSP27 when HSF1 is up-regulated, except when the expression of HSF1 is already too high. These results document for the first time that HSF1 is overexpressed in human prostate cancer cells, at least one consequence of which in the prostate cancer cell. lines tested is stimulation of both basal and stress-induced expression of HSP27, an important factor in cell growth, differentiation, or apoptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据