4.5 Article

Role of G protein-coupled receptor kinases in glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor signaling

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 141, 期 3, 页码 947-952

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.141.3.947

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-52186] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK052186] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) is a member of class II G protein-coupled receptors. Recent studies have suggested that desensitization of the GIPR might contribute to impaired insulin secretion in type II diabetic patients, but the molecular mechanisms of GIPR signal termination are unknown. Using HEK L293 cells stably transfected with GIPR complementary DNA (L293-GIPR), the mechanisms of GIPR desensitization were investigated. GIP dose dependently increased intracellular cAMP levels in L293-GIPR cells, but this response was abolished (65%) by cotransfection with G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2), but not with GRK5 or GRK6. beta-Arrestin-1 transfection also induced a significantly decrease in GIP-stimulated cAMP production, and this effect was greater with cotransfection of both GRK2 and beta-arrestin-1 than with either alone. In beta TC3 cells, expression of GRK2 or beta-arrestin-1 attenuated GIP-induced insulin release and cAMP production, whereas glucose-stimulated insulin secretion was not affected. GRK2 and beta-arrestin-1 messenger RNAs were identified by Northern blot analysis to be expressed endogenously in beta TC3 and L293 cells. Overexpression of GRK2 enhanced agonist-induced GIPR phosphorylation, but receptor endocytosis was not affected by cotransfection with GRKs or beta-arrestin-1. These results suggest a potential role for GRK2/beta-arrestin-1 system in modulating GIP-mediated insulin secretion in pancreatic islet cells. Furthermore, GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation is not required for endocytosis of the GIPR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据