4.5 Article

Comparison of linear and nonlinear forms of isotherm models for strontium sorption on a sodium bentonite

期刊

出版社

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1010694910170

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sorption on bentonite will play an important role in retarding the migration of radionuclides from a waste repository. Bentonite is characterized by low permeability, water swelling capability and excellent sorption potential for cationic radionuclides. To correctly assess the sorption potential of radionuclides on bentonite is essential for the development of predictive migration models. The sorption isotherm model is usually used to describe the sorption behavior and assess the sorption potential of radionuclides on bentonite. However, there are few studies to investigate the feasibility uf isotherm models for the sorption of radionuclides on bentonite. Thus, in this study, we compared the goodness-of-fit of linear and nonlinear forms of two common isotherm MX-80, Langmuir and Freundlich equations. The experimental sorption isotherms of strontium (Sr) on Wyoming bentonite, MX-80, were used for illustration. The results showed that the nonlinear forms of Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models are more suitable for fitting the experimental sorption isotherms of Sr on MX-80 than are the linear forms. Thus, the nonlinear forms of isotherm models should be primarily adopted to fit experimental isotherms. On the other hand, we also found that the goodness-of-fit of Langmuir model is better than that of Freundlich model. Moreover, based on the theoretical assumptions of Langmuir isotherm model, the parameters M acid K-L represent the sorption capacity and affinity, respectively. One can use the values of M and K-L, obtained from fitting the experimental isotherms, to assess the sorption potential of radionuclides in bentonite. Thus, we suggested that the Langmuir isotherm model is more useful for investigating the sorption behavior of radionuclides on bentonite.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据