4.3 Article

Characterisation and activity of sol-gel-prepared TiO2 photocatalysts modified with Ca, Sr or Ba ion additives

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 2358-2363

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b004384m

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TiO2 (anatase)-based photocatalyst powders containing up to 20 mol% calcium, strontium or barium ions were prepared from alpha-titanic acid by calcining gels prepared from triethanolamine-based sols at 600 degrees C. The powders were characterised using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), diffuse reflectance ultraviolet spectrophotometry, nitrogen sorption porosimetry and in situ infrared spectroscopy to examine surface adsorbed species. Compositions containing greater than 15 mol% alkaline earth ions resulted in largely amorphous materials. The residual anatase showed decreased crystallite sizes and increased crystallographic cell volumes with increasing concentration of alkaline earth ions, while the BET surface areas of the materials increased from around 80 m(2) g(-1) (no additive) to 160 m(2) g(-1) at higher levels of additive. Electronic spectroscopy showed that the band gaps of the materials increased with increasing Ca2+ content, due to the decreasing particle sizes. Under the synthesis conditions used, no other crystalline phase was observed, except rutile (< 1% w.r.t. anatase). The photocatalytic decomposition of oxalic acid was used as a model system to determine the relative influences of the additives on the photocatalytic activities. Titania containing 20 mol% alkaline earth ions showed approximately double the photocatalytic activity of similarly prepared anatase without additive. Half of the enhancement occurred for titania samples containing only 2 mol% alkaline earth ions. Comparisons of the physico-chemical properties of the photocatalysts with oxalic acid decomposition rates were carried out to determine the factors influencing the photocatalytic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据