4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Endothelin and pulmonary hypertension

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 35, 期 -, 页码 S49-S53

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005344-200000002-00012

关键词

hypoxic response; pulmonary hypertension; vascular remodeling; endothelin (ET); endothelin-A (ETA) receptor antagonist

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biochemical and molecular biological evidence indicates that endothelin (ET)-1 and its receptors are selectively upregulated in the lung during exposure to hypoxia, while functional evidence indicates that ET-1 is a major mediator of hypoxia-induced pulmonary vasoconstriction and vascular remodeling. Hypoxia stimulates ET-1 gene transcription and peptide synthesis in cultured endothelial cells, and plasma ET-1 levels are increased in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension, and in humans exposed to high altitude, while immunoreactive ET-1 and ET-1 mRNA levels are increased in pulmonary artery endothelial cells of patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Rats exposed to normobaric hypoxia exhibit increased pulmonary artery pressure, increased ET-1 peptide levels in plasma and lung, and selective increases in steady-state ET-1 and ETA and ETB receptor mRNA levels in lung but not in organs perfused by the systemic vasculature. The observations that both ET-1 and its major vascular smooth-muscle cell receptor are upregulated in response to hypoxia suggest that ET-1 may be a mediator of hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension. Moreover, hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and vascular remodeling can be prevented and reversed by administration of either an ETA-selective or a combined ETA and ETB receptor antagonist. These findings support the hypothesis that endogenous ET-1 plays a major role in hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction/hypertension right heart hypertrophy, and pulmonary vascular remodeling and suggest that ET-receptor blockers may be useful in the treatment and prevention of hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据