4.7 Article

Formation of new particles in the gas-phase ozonolysis of monoterpenes

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 34, 期 23, 页码 4031-4042

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00133-3

关键词

monoterpenes; ozone; organic acids; secondary organic aerosol; dicarboxylic acids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The formation of organic acids and secondary organic aerosol in the gas-phase ozonolysis was investigated by laboratory experiments at 295 +/- 2 K in the absence of seed aerosol for a series of monoterpenes (beta-pinene, sabinene, alpha-pinene, Delta(3)-carene, limonene, terpinolene) and methylene-cyclo-hexane and methyl-cyclo-hexene as model compounds. In the filter samples of the aerosol produced by ozonolysis series of organic acids were identified as methyl ester using GC/MS. In the ozonolysis of beta-pinene, sabinene, alpha-pinene, Delta(3)-carene and limonene the corresponding C-9-dicarboxylic acids were found as main products of the organic acid fraction. In case of terpinolene, methylene-cyclo-hexane and methyl-cyclo-hexene C-7- and C-6-dicarboxylic acids, respectively, were detected. The yields of these dicarboxylic acids were determined to range between 1 and 5 mol% using ion chromatography. Particle formation was observed with a 10 nm condensation nuclei counter after the consumption of (6.1 +/- 0.3) x 10(10) molecule cm(-3) of beta-pinene, sabinene, alpha-pinene, Delta(3)-carene and limonene, respectively. In case of terpinolene, methylene-cyclo-hexane and methyl-cyclo-hexene (1.8 +/- 0.1) x 10(11) molecule cm(-3) of the reactants were converted. Upper limits for the partial vapor pressures of the dicarboxylic acids in the aerosol were determined to be (5.6 +/- 4.0)x 10(-8) Torr for the Cg-dicarboxylic acids and (1.7 +/- 1.2)x 10(-7) Torr for the C7- and C-6-dicarboxylic acids. The formation of secondary organic aerosol by ozonolysis of terpenes under suitable atmospheric conditions has most likely to be taken into account. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据