4.6 Article

Inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase sensitize human smooth muscle cells to Fas-ligand and cytokine-induced cell death

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 152, 期 1, 页码 217-227

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9150(99)00462-1

关键词

hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors; cell death; smooth muscle cells; FasL; cytokines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statins, have been shown to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Atherosclerotic plaque lesions can be chronically inflamed and vulnerable to rupture or stable and less rupture-prone. Human smooth muscle cells (SMC) are critically important in maintaining the stability of atherosclerotic plaques. This stability may be greatly influenced by pro-inflammatory mediators such as IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, and II-1 beta and Fas ligand (FasL) that are present in human atheroma. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of the statins on apoptosis of SMC. We have found that SMC are normally resistant to Fas or cytokine-induced apoptosis, but can be sensitized to these agents with pharmacological concentrations of some statins. Simvastatin and lovastatin strongly sensitized the cells to apoptotic agents while atorvastatin was less effective. In contrast to the lipophilic statins, the hydrophilic statin pravastatin did not induce this sensitization of SMC to apoptosis. Treatment of SMC with either mevalonate, the product of the HMG-CoA reductase, or geranylgeranylpyrophosphate, a down stream intermediate, prevented lipophilic statin-induced sensitization to apoptosis. These results suggest that prenylation of one or more proteins is critically involved in regulating the sensitivity of SMC to apoptotic stimuli. Our data support the emerging evidence that through this pathway the various statins may have effects which are beyond a simple lowering of the levels of circulating cholesterol. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据