4.6 Article

Working memory dysfunction in major depression: an event-related potential study

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 111, 期 9, 页码 1531-1543

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00354-0

关键词

depression; working memory; event-related potential; Sternberg paradigm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To study working memory function in untreated major depression using a digit probe identification and matching task. Methods: We compared behavioural performance and event-related potentials during processing of the Sternberg working memory task in 14 depressed patients and 13 healthy matched control subjects. Results: patients made more mistakes than controls as the memory load was increased from one to 5 digits and had significantly slower reaction times at all levels of memory load. The patients' event-related potentials (ERPs) differed significantly from controls. pathological changes were similar for auditory and visual presentation. Surface negative activity in the 157-210 ms section of the waveform was reduced for all levels of memory load, suggesting abnormal sensory/perceptual processing in the modality-specific association cortices, possibly due to a failure of selective attention mechanisms. In the 375-840 ms epoch, the patients' responses showed large amplitude sustained negative activity, maximal at CZ and a reduced late positive wave. The large prolonged negativity in the patients' ERPs suggests activation of additional neuronal assemblies than those normally participating in the task. This could reflect either compensatory mechanism or dysfunction of inhibitory systems. These changes were sensitive to memory load, suggesting that they reflect alterations of memory-related processes. Conclusions: This study provides objective evidence that major depression significantly affects working memory. The ERP changes in depression could he accounted for by dysfunction of the central executive control of working memory. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据