4.2 Article

The cytotoxicity of chronic neuroinflammation upon basal forebrain cholinergic neurons of rats can be attenuated by glutamatergic antagonism or cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 134, 期 1, 页码 58-65

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s002210000446

关键词

neuroinflammation; basal forebrain; acetylcholine; cyclooxygenase; glutamate

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG010546] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [T32DA007295] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NIA NIH HHS [R0I AG10546] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDA NIH HHS [T32DA-07295] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proinflammagen lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was infused chronically (37 days) into the basal forebrain of rats. The current study determined whether the chronic administration of either a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate- (NMDA-) sensitive receptor antagonist, memantine, or a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2)/lipoxygenase inhibitor, CI987, could provide significant neuroprotection from the cytotoxic effects of LPS-induced neuroinflammation. Chronic LPS infusions decreased cortical choline acetyltransferase activity, which paralleled a decline in the number of choline-acetyltransferase-immunoreactive-cells within the basal forebrain as well as the number of activated resident microglia. The infusions appeared to be selective for cholinergic neurons. Peripheral administration of memantine (i.p.) or CI987 (s.c.) significantly attenuated the cytotoxic effects of the chronic inflammatory processes upon cholinergic cells within the basal forebrain. However, only CI987 attenuated the neuroinflammation produced by LPS and the subsequent changes in microglial activation. These results indicate that the cytotoxic effects of chronic neuroinflammation may involve prostanoid synthesis and may operate through NMDA receptors, and that the effects of prostaglandins occur upstream to NMDA-receptor activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据