4.5 Article

Both Th1-and Th2-derived cytokines in serum are elevated in Graves' ophthalmopathy

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 121, 期 3, 页码 453-457

出版社

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01335.x

关键词

Graves' ophthalmopathy; IL-1RA; sIL-2R; IL-6; IL-6R; TNF alpha R; sCD30; smoking; thyroid disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increased serum cytokine levels have been reported in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease, but less is known about their levels in patients with Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO). It is not known whether GO is a cell-mediated or humoral autoimmune disease. We investigated whether serum cytokines are elevated in GO patients and whether the cytokines were Th1- or Th2-derived. In addition, elevated cytokines might reflect the activity of GO, and thus we investigated whether cytokine levels could predict the clinical response to orbital radiotherapy. We studied 62 consecutive patients with moderately severe untreated GO and 62 healthy controls, matched for sex, age and smoking habits. Serum concentrations of IL-1RA, sIL-2R, IL-6, sIL-6R, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) RI and II and sCD30 were measured using highly sensitive ELISAs, in the patients before and 3 and 6 months after radiotherapy. All patients were euthyroid, with anti-thyroid drugs, before and during the entire study period. All baseline cytokine and cytokine receptor levels were significantly elevated in GO patients compared with healthy controls, except for IL-1RA. The levels did not correlate with parameters of the thyroid disease, nor with the duration, activity or severity of GO. However, backward logistic regression analysis showed that IL-6, sCD30 and TNF alpha RI were able to predict a beneficial response to orbital radiotherapy. We therefore conclude that both Th1- and Th2-derived cytokines are elevated in GO patients compared with its controls. IL-6, sCD30 and TNF alpha RI had some value for predicting therapeutic outcome to orbital irradiation, and may thus reflect active eye disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据