期刊
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
卷 131, 期 3, 页码 337-343出版社
AMER DENTAL ASSN
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0177
关键词
-
Background. The authors evaluated the treatment efficacy of preformed metal crowns, or PMCs, vs, amalgam restorations in primary molars by means of a literature review and meta-analysis. Types of Studies Reviewed. From a literature search, the authors selected clinical studies that evaluated treatment with PMCs vs. amalgam control restorations in primary molars and provided data against which treatment outcomes could be compared. Results. Ten studies with durations ranging from 1.6 to 10 years fulfilled the selection criteria. Their failure rates, based on need for subsequent treatment or retention of the restoration at final evaluation, ranged from 1.9 to 30.3 percent for PMCs and 11.6 to 88.7 percent for amalgam restorations. Overall, PMCs demonstrated;greater longevity and reduced retreatment need compared with amalgam control restorations. The odds ratio for all studies fell : within the boundary favoring treatment with PMCs. Clinical Implications. Analysis of the literature, though mainly retrospective studies, demonstrated evidence of a more favorable outcome for PMCs than for amalgam restorations in primary molars requiring multisurface restorations.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据