4.5 Review

Interpretation of echocardiographic measurements: A call for standardization

期刊

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 139, 期 3, 页码 412-422

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8703(00)90084-X

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [N0I-HC-38038] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R0I-NS-17950] Funding Source: Medline
  3. DIVISION OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CLINICAL APPLICATIONS [N01HC038038] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS017950] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Although echocardiography is used extensively in clinical medicine, guidelines for quantitative interpretation of echocardiographic measurements are unavailable. The goals of this investigation were to provide an overview of scientific standards for formulating reference values, with clinical chemistry used as a model, to evaluate published echocardiographic reference limits, to survey clinical echocardiography laboratories regarding their interpretation of echocardiographic measurements, and to provide recommendations for improving the interpretation and reporting of echocardiographic measurements. Methods and Results We reviewed the original reports of the international Federation of Clinical Chemistry on guidelines for formulating reference valves. We obtained published reports on echocardiographic reference limits through searches of electronic databases supplemented by a manual search of relevant bibliographies. We also surveyed echocardiographic laboratories in 35 adult acute-care hospitals in Eastern Massachusetts. Studies on echocardiographic reference values were evaluated with the use of guidelines from clinical chemistry. Responses from the 29 participating echocardiographic laboratories were evaluated for their practice of quantitative echocardiographic interpretation. There is considerable heterogeneity in the echocardiographic reference values available in the literature. There is also a lack of agreement in the literature and among echocardiographers regarding the partitioning of reference values (by sex, ethnicity, or age), the anthropometric measure to be used for indexation, and the choice of cut-points for categorizing values within the abnormal range. Conclusions We advocate that echocardiographic reference limits be standardized and a consensus generated regarding the partitioning of reference limits and the indexation of echocardiographic measurements, Such measures can aid in quantitative echocardiographic interpretation and render the results more scientific and consistent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据