4.6 Article

Pubertal development and growth after total-body irradiation and bone marrow transplantation for haematological malignancies

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 159, 期 1-2, 页码 31-37

出版社

SPRINGER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s004310050006

关键词

bone marrow transplantation; whole-body irradiation; haematological neoplasms; puberty

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pubertal development after total-body irradiation (TBI) was investigated in 40 children (21 boys) treated with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for haematological malignancies at a mean age of 11.3 years. The mean age at the last visit was 19.0 years, Twenty-five patients (15 boys) were prepubertal at BMT. Data on secondary sexual characteristics, the pituitary-gonadal axis and longitudinal growth were retrospectively collected from the medical records. In boys not receiving additional testicular irradiation (n = 19), penile growth and pubic hair development was normal and all had serum testosterone levels within the adult range. The majority of them, however, had incidental elevations of LH, suggesting minor Leydig cell damage. Testicular volume at last measurement was small (mean: 10.5 ml) and serum FSH levels were elevated in all boys, with normalisation in only one, suggesting severe impairment of reproductive gonadal function. Of the ten girls who received BMT before puberty, six had a spontaneous onset of puberty and menarche; the four other girls needed hormonal substitution therapy. Recovery of gonadal function after cessation of substitution was seen in one girl, who became pregnant but had a spontaneous abortion. Decrease in height SDS was seen in the majority of patients and was positively correlated with male gender and lower age at the time of BMT. Conclusion Careful monitoring of both gonadal function and growth after bone marrow transplantation and total body irradiation is warranted in order to detect disturbances early and ensure normal pubertal development in children treated for haematological malignancies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据