4.6 Article

Visual contrast response functions in Parkinson's disease: evidence from electroretinograms, visually evoked potentials and psychophysics

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 111, 期 1, 页码 66-74

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00223-0

关键词

contrast discrimination; electroretinogram; visual evoked potentials; Parkinson's disease; neurodegenerative diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Visual contrast detection thresholds and suprathreshold contrast discrimination thresholds were compared to luminance and flash/pattern electroretinograms (ERG) and visually evoked potentials (VEP) in patients with Parkinson's disease (n = 31), patients with multiple system atrophy (n = 6), patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (n = 6) and control patients without central nervous disease (n = 33). Methods: The stimuli were luminance modulated full-field (flash) or horizontally oriented sinewave gratings (pattern), the latter having either a low (0.5 cycles/deg) or medium (4.0 cycles/deg) spatial frequency. Stimulus contrast ranged from 10 to 80% so that contrast response functions could be derived. Results: Contrast thresholds were higher in the patients with Parkinson's disease than in the control patients. Contrast discrimination thresholds were also somewhat elevated in patients with Parkinson's disease. Pattern ERG amplitudes were significantly reduced in patients with Parkinson's disease for the medium spatial frequency stimulus, but less for the low spatial frequency and flash stimuli. Conclusions: Our results suggest that Parkinson's disease impairs contrast processing in the retina. VEP amplitudes did not significantly differ between the groups for the conditions tested. Patients with progressive supranuclear palsy also showed impaired contrast perception and reduced ERG amplitudes, whereas patients with multiple system atrophy were less impaired. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据