4.3 Article

Signal detection theory in the 2AFC paradigm: attention, channel uncertainty and probability summation

期刊

VISION RESEARCH
卷 40, 期 22, 页码 3121-3144

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00157-7

关键词

psychophysics; summation; probability summation; 2AFC; attention; uncertainty; signal detection theory; additive noise; multiplicative noise

资金

  1. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R01EY007890] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY 7890] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neural implementation of classical High-Threshold Theory reveals fundamental flaws in its applicability to realistic neural systems and to the two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) paradigm. For 2AFC, Signal Detection Theory provides a basis for accurate analysis of the observer's attentional strategy and effective degree of probability summation over attended neural channels. The resulting theory provides substantially different predictions from those of previous approximation analyses. Tn additive noise, attentional probability summation depends on the attentional model assumed. (I) For an ideal attentional strategy in additive noise, summation proceeds at a diminishing rate from an initial level of fourth-root summation for the first few channels. The maximum improvement asymptotes to about a factor of 4 by a million channels. (2) For a fixed attention field in additive noise, detection is highly inefficient at first and approximates fourth-root summation through the summation range. (3) In physiologically plausible root-multiplicative noise, on the other hand, attentional probability summation mimics a linear improvement in sensitivity up to about ten channels, approaching a factor of 1000 by a million channels. (4) Some noise sources, such as noise from eye movements, are fully multiplicative and would prevent threshold determination within their range of effectiveness. Such results may require reappraisal of previous interpretations of detection behavior in the 2AFC paradigm. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据