4.4 Article

The meaning of diagnostic test results: A spreadsheet for swift data analysis

期刊

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
卷 55, 期 3, 页码 227-235

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1053/crad.1999.0444

关键词

diagnostic techniques; procedures; imaging; radiology; Bayes' theorem; sensitivity; specificity; likelihood functions; decision making; computers; software

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIMS: To design a spreadsheet program to: (a) analyse rapidly diagnostic test result data produced in local research or reported in the literature; (b) correct reported predictive values for disease prevalence in any population; (c) estimate the post-test probability of disease in individual patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Microsoft Excel(TM) was used, Section A: a contingency (2 x 2) table was incorporated into the spreadsheet. Formulae for standard calculations [sample size, disease prevalence, sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals, predictive values and likelihood ratios (LRs)] were linked to this table. The results change automatically when the data in the true or false negative and positive cells are changed. Section B: this estimates predictive values in any population, compensating for altered disease prevalence. Sections C-F: Bayes' theorem was incorporated to generate individual post-test probabilities. The spreadsheet generates 95% confidence intervals, LRs and a table and graph of conditional probabilities once the sensitivity and specificity of the test are entered. The tatter shows the expected post-test probability of disease for any pre-test probability when a test of known sensitivity and specificity is positive or negative, RESULTS: This spreadsheet can be used on desktop and palmtop computers. The MS Excel(TM) version can be downloaded via the Internet from the URL ftp://radiography.com/pub/Rad-data99.xls CONCLUSION: A spreadsheet is useful for contingency table data analysis and assessment of the clinical meaning of diagnostic test results. (C) 2000 The Royal College of Radiologists.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据