4.6 Article

Low-dose lidocaine reduces secondary hyperalgesia by a central mode of action

期刊

PAIN
卷 85, 期 1-2, 页码 217-224

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00268-7

关键词

pain; capsaicin; allodynia; flare; intravenous; lidocaine; bier block

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sodium channel blockers are approved for intravenous administration in the treatment of neuropathic pain states. Preclinical studies have suggested antihyperalgesic effects on the peripheral as well as the central nervous system. The objective of this study was to determine mechanisms of action of low-dose Lidocaine in experimental induced, secondary hyperalgesia. In a first experimental trial, participants (n = 12) received lidocaine systemically (a bolus injection of 2 mg/kg in 10 min followed by an intravenous infusion of 2 mg kg(-1) h(-1) for another 50 min). In a second trial, a modified intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) was administered to exclude possible central analgesic effects. In one arm, patients received an infusion of 40 mi lidocaine, 0.05%; in the other arm 40 mi NaCl, 0.9%, served as a control. In both trials capsaicin, 20 mu g, was injected intradermally and time course of capsaicin-induced pain, allodynia and hyperalgesia as well as axon reflex flare was determined. The capsaicin-induced pain was slightly reduced after systemic and regional application of the anesthetic. The area of pin-prick hyperalgesia was significantly reduced by systemic lidocaine, whereas the inhibition of hyperalgesia was absent during regional administration of lidocaine. In contrast, capsaicin-induced flare was significantly decreased after both treatments. We conclude that systemic lidocaine reduces pin-prick hyperalgesia by a central mode of action, which could involve blockade of terminal branches of nociceptors. A possible role for tetrodotoxin resistant sodium channels in the antihyperalgesic effect of low-dose lidocaine is discussed. (C) 2000 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. Al rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据