4.6 Article

Monomethylarsonous acid (MMA(III)) is more toxic than arsenite in Chang human hepatocytes

期刊

TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
卷 163, 期 2, 页码 203-207

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/taap.1999.8872

关键词

arsenate; arsenite; Chang human hepatocytes; dimethylarsinic acid; DMA; DMA(V); DMPS; LDH; monomethylarsonic acid; monomethylarsonous acid; MMA(V); MMA(III); potassium; XTT

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30-ES-06694, ES04940] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [P42ES004940, P30ES006694] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methylation has been considered to be the primary detoxication pathway of inorganic arsenic. Inorganic arsenic is methylated by many, but not all animal species, to monomethylarsonic acid (MMA(V)), monomethylarsonous acid (MMA(III)), and dimethylarsinic acid (DMA(V)). The As-V derivatives have been assumed to produce low toxicity, but the relative toxicity of MMA(III) remains unknown. In vitro toxicities of arsenate, arsenite, MMA(V), MMA(III) and DMA(V) were determined in Chang human hepatocytes, Leakage of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and intracellular potassium (K+) and mitochondrial metabolism of the tetrazolium salt XTT were used to assess cytotoxicity due to arsenic exposure. The mean LC50 based on LDH assays in phosphate media was 6 mu M for MMA(III) and 68 mu M for arsenite. Using the assay for K+ leakage in phosphate media, the mean LC50 was 6.3 mu M for MMA(III) and 19.8 mu M for arsenite. The mean LC50 based on the XTT assay in phosphate media was 13.6 mu M for MMA(III) and 164 mu M for arsenite. The results of the three cytotoxicity assays (LDH, K+, and XTT) reveal the following order of toxicity in Chang human hepatocytes: MMA(III) > arsenite > arsenate > MMA(V) = DMA(V). Data demonstrate that MMA(III) an intermediate in inorganic arsenic methylation, is highly toxic and again raises the question as to whether methylation of inorganic arsenic is a detoxication process. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据