4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Temporary nutrient deficiency - A difficult case for diagnosis and prognosis by plant analysis

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS
卷 31, 期 11-14, 页码 1847-1861

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00103620009370542

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant analysis aims to either detect deficiency at the time of sampling (diagnosis) or predict its occurrence at a later stage of growth (prognosis). Its use is based on the presumption that the plant nutrient status will either be constant with plant age or follow a predictable pattern of change over time after sampling. However, a period of deficiency during plant growth followed by the recovery of nutrient uptake to satisfactory rates may cause an irreversible impairment of growth which plant analysis fails to diagnose or predict. Several cases are considered, each involving a temporary deficiency of, or interruption to nutrient supply. Such cases generally involve but are not restricted to micronutrient deficiency. For example, B deficiency impairs early seedling growth when seeds low in B are planted, even on B fertilised soils. Low B concentration in seeds diagnoses the subsequent impairment of seed germination or seedling establishment: however, leaf analysis after emergence does not. Similarly, Zn deficiency impairs early growth of transplanted oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) seedlings and eventually depresses seed yield. However, leaf analysis during crop growth fails to diagnose a Zn deficiency. Finally, temporary B deficiency induced by low vapour pressure deficit or low soil water especially during reproductive development may depress yield markedly but remain difficult to diagnose by plant analysis. Strategies for diagnosing and predicting such temporary deficiencies are discussed including the measurement of environmental parameters such as pan evaporation or rainfall and their inclusion in multi-variate regression models of plant response to nutrients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据