4.5 Article

Immune dysfunction following trauma-haemorrhage: Influence of gender and age

期刊

CYTOKINE
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 69-77

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1006/cyto.1999.0511

关键词

immunodepression; IL-1 beta; IL-6; IL-10; macrophage

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM037127] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM37127] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies indicate that young female proestrus mice show an enhanced immune response following trauma-haemorrhage, as opposed to the immunodepression observed in males of comparable age. Testosterone is suggested as the cause of immunodepression in males, whereas oestradiol seems to be responsible for the enhanced immune response in females, however, sex hormone levels decrease with age. To determine if the sexual dimorphism in immune responses observed in young mice following trauma-haemorrhage changes with age, young (2-3 months) and aged (18-19 months) male and female CBA/J NIA mice were subjected to soft-tissue trauma (laparatomy) and haemorrhage (35+5 mmHg for 90 min and fluid resuscitation) or sham operation. Mice were killed 24 h later, and whole blood, as well as splenic and peritoneal macrophages (M phi) obtained. Plasma 17 beta-oestradiol and free testosterone decreased in aged females and males, respectively, M phi from young females had enhanced IL-1 beta and suppressed IL-10 production following trauma-haemorrhage, while aged females had unchanged production IL-1 beta and IL-6 production and enhanced IL-10 release. In contrast, IL-1 beta and IL-6 production by MP from young males was suppressed and IL-10 production enhanced following trauma-haemorrhage, whereas M phi from aged males produced elevated levels of IL-1 beta and IL-6 and suppressed levels of IL-10 following trauma-haemorrhage. Thus, the gender-related changes in the immune response to trauma-haemorrhage were reversed in aged mice, (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据