4.6 Article

A double-labeling immunohistochemical study of tau exon 10 in Alzheimer's disease, progressive supranuclear palsy and Pick's disease

期刊

ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA
卷 100, 期 3, 页码 235-244

出版社

SPRINGER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s004019900177

关键词

tau; exon 10; Alzheimer's disease; progressive supranuclear palsy; Pick's disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurofibrillary tangles (NFT), one of the histopathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and Pick bodies in Pick's disease (PiD) are composed of microtubule-associated protein tau, which is the product of alternative splicing of a gene on chromosome 17. Alternative expression of exon 10 leads to formation of three- or four-repeat tau isoforms. To study the differential expression of exon 10, we performed double-labeling immunohistochemistry of the hippocampal formation in nine AD, four PSP and three PiD cases. Cryostat sections were processed with and without formic acid (FA) treatment, and double-stained with anti-tau (Alz-50 or PHF-1) or anti-amyloid P component antibodies and one of two specific anti-exon 10 antibodies (E-10). The effect of proteinase-K treatment was also evaluated. The results suggest the following. First. in AD, E-10 immunoreactivity is present in most intracellular NFT, but not in most dystrophic neurites and neuropil threads, suggesting differential expression of tau isoforms in specific cellular domains. Second, in AD, E-10 immunoreactivity is lost or blocked in most extracellular NFT, possibly due to proteolysis. Third, in PSP, E-10 immunoreactivity is hidden or blocked in NFT and tau-positive glial inclusions, but FA treatment exposes the epitope consistent with the hypothesis that PSP inclusions contain four-repeat tau. Fourth, E-10 immunoreactivity is present in dentate fascia NFT in AD and PSP, but not in Pick bodies in the dentate fascia or other areas. The results suggest that expression of exon 10 in tau is specific for cellular domains in a disease-specific manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据