4.6 Article

Health and functional capacity as predictors of community dwelling among elderly people

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 53, 期 3, 页码 257-265

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00178-X

关键词

community dwelling; institution use; functional capacity; activities of daily living; elderly people; health status

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to identify factors that predict community dwelling (i.e., nonuse of institutional bed-days) among elderly people. This was a longitudinal study of institution use including both short-term and long-term use of hospitals and nursing homes. The impact of health, functional performance, and carrying out the activities of daily living on community dwelling was studied using the method of path analysis. The participants were all the 75-year-old (N = 388) and 80-year-old (N = 291) men and women resident in the City of Jyvaskyla, Finland. Predictor variables included disease severity, symptoms of illness, cognitive capacity, walking speed, muscle strength, hearing, and ability to carry out the activities of daily living. The outcome variable was community dwelling. Over 70% of the elderly people had received institutional care during the 5-year follow-up. The path analysis models showed that disease severity and symptoms of illness had an effect on community dwelling: those with a more severe disease or more symptoms needed more institutional care. The effect was also mediated through limitations in physical performance and cognitive capacity and need for assistance in activities of daily living. The explanatory power of these models varied from 23% to 36%. The results of this study suggest that prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation programs aimed at the promotion of community dwelling in elderly people should focus on the severity of diseases, functional performance. and the ability to carry out the activities of daily living. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据