4.6 Article

Axial control of thermal coagulation using a multi-element interstitial ultrasound applicator with internal cooling

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/58.818759

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A multi-element, direct-coupled ultrasound (US) applicator with internal water cooling was investigated for axial control of interstitial thermal coagulation. A prototype implantable applicator was constructed with a linear a-ray of three tubular PZT ultrasound transducers teach 2.5 mm OD, 10 mm length, 360 degrees emittance). Acoustic beam distributions from each element were measured and found to be collimated within the transducer length. The internally cooled applicator could sustain high levels of applied power to each transducer (0 to 40 W) and maintain acceptable applicator surface temperatures (<100 degrees). Thermal performance of the applicator was investigated through heating trials in vivo (porcine thigh muscle and liver) and in vitro (bovine liver). The radial depth of thermal lesions produced was dependent on the applied power and sonication time and was controlled independently with power levels to each transducer element. With 18 W per element (applied electrical power) for 3 min, cylindrical thermal lesions were produced with a diameter of similar to 3 cm and a length ranging from 1.2 cm (with one element) to 3.5 cm (three elements). Higher powers (24 to 30 W) for 3 to 5 min provided increased depths of coagulation (similar to 4 cm diameter lesions). Analysis of axial lesion shapes demonstrated that individual variation of power to each transducer element provided control of axial heating and depth of coagulation (for custom lesion shapes); lesion lengths corresponded to the number of active transducers. This ability to control the heating distribution dynamically along the length of the applicator has potential for improved target localization of thermal coagulation and necrosis in high temperature thermal therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据