4.4 Review

Molecular basis of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity and its prevention

期刊

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM
卷 71, 期 1-2, 页码 436-444

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/mgme.2000.3043

关键词

anthracyclines; antioxidants; cardiotoxicity; free radicals; reactive oxygen species

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anthracyclines are a class of highly potent antitumor antibiotics utilized against hematologic and solid tumors in children and in adults. Their use has been limited primarily by their cardiotoxic side effects, which may lead to congestive heart failure. Although there is a linear relationship between the cumulative dose received and the incidence of cardiotoxicity, in some patients cardiotoxicity may develop at doses below the generally accepted threshold level. Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity is believed to be related to the generation of highly reactive oxygen species, which, by means of membrane lipid peroxidation, cause direct damage to cardiac myocyte membranes. Another important factor may be the relatively poor antioxidant defense system of the heart. In an attempt to circumvent these toxic effects, a wide variety of antioxidants have been used in cell culture, animal, and human studies without consistent beneficial effects. Moreover, none of the agents used to date are designed to act selectively upon the heart. If the cardiac complications resulting from anthracyclines could be reduced and/or prevented, higher doses could potentially be used, thereby increasing cancer cure rates. Furthermore, the incidence of cardiac toxicity resulting in congestive heart failure or even heart transplantation would be reduced, therefore increasing the quality and extent of life for cancer survivors. This article will review the basic science of free radical biology, the biology of oxygen-derived free radicals and antioxidant proteins, and explore some new and innovative approaches to limiting and/or preventing anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据