4.4 Article

Retinal pigment epithelial autotransplantation: morphological changes in retina and choroid

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s004170000132

关键词

-

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [P01-EY01765] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [P30EY001765] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Replacment of degenerating retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells has been proposed to promote photoreceptor survival in retinal pigment epithelial disease. However, allografts of RPE have a higher rate of immunological rejection. The investigators studied the effects of autotransplantation of RPE on the morphological changes in photoreceptors and choriocapillaris. Methods: RPE autotransplantation (wound type 1) was performed in 25 rabbits and compared with wounds following debridement of the RPE (wound type 2). Light and electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy of choroidal vascular casts were performed at 3, 7, 13 and 30 days after surgery. Quantitative analysis of the choriocapillaris bed area was performed by automated image analysis and the results were analyzed by paired Student's t-test. Results: Retinal pigment epithelium was found to be monolayered and ill-differentiated at day 7. Differentiation occurred at day 30, with preservation of photoreceptors and other layers of the neurosensory retina in type 1 wounds. Type 2 wounds showed atrophy of the regenerating retinal pigment epithelium at day 14 and day 30 with loss of overlying photoreceptor cell layer. There was significant choriocapillaris regeneration in type 1 wounds compared to the type 2 wounds at day 7 (P = 0.045), day 14 (P = 0.028) & day 30 (P = 0.06). Conclusions: Retinal pigment epithelial autotransplantation significantly reduced photoreceptor degeneration and choriocapillaris atrophy associated with loss of retinal pigment epithelium. This procedure supports the hypothesis that RPE autotransplantation may be helpful in geographic atrophy and conditions requiring submacular surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据