4.2 Article

Loss of aggression, after transfer onto a C57BL/6J background, in mice carrying a targeted disruption of the neuronal nitric oxide synthase gene

期刊

BEHAVIOR GENETICS
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 367-373

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1002796404278

关键词

gene-targeting; passenger genes; neural nitric oxide synthase; Nos1; C57BL/6J; 129/SvPas; aggression; mice

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phenotypic differences among mice with disrupted genes and those with wild-type alleles have not provided the necessary evidence for desired gene/phenotype correlations. These differences could be due to passenger genes from the donor 129 strains that are used to produce stem cells. Three variations of attack behavior were measured, using mice carrying a disruption of the neural nitric oxide synthase gene. In the first population, the disrupted gene had been maintained on a mixed background including C57BL/6J and 129 alleles. We have developed a second population in which the disrupted gene was transferred onto a C57BL/6J background during five backcross generations. On the mixed C57BL/6J-129 background, mice homozygous for disrupted Nos1 alleles attacked more frequently, had shorter attack latencies, and presented a greater number of attacks than mice carrying nondisrupted alleles. On the C57BL/6J background, no significant difference persisted between the carriers of the disrupted gene and their noncarrier siblings. The noncarriers on the mixed C57BL/6J-129 background, and the carriers or noncarriers on the C57BL/6J background, did not differ from C57BL/6J. The frequency of attacking males was identical in the homozygous carriers of the disrupted gene, in the mixed C57BL/6J-129 background, and in the 129/SvPas, which approximates the 129/SvJae strain from which the stem cells were derived to produce the disrupted Nos1 gene. These results suggest that Nos1 disruption was not implicated in attack behavior. A possible passenger-gene effect from the 129 donor strain is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据