4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Mitigation of asphaltics deposition during CO2 flood by enhancing CO2 solvency with chemical modifiers

期刊

ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY
卷 31, 期 12, 页码 1451-1462

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00082-6

关键词

mitigation; organic deposition; carbon dioxide; asphaltics; miscible flood; supercritical fluid; chemical modifiers; extraction efficiency; enhanced oil recovery; reservoir; injectivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CO2 injected in the reservoir of McElroy Field, TX, for a CO2 flood was in the supercritical state. Supercritical CO2 fluid is capable of extracting light and intermediate hydrocarbons from rocks but is unable to extract heavy hydrocarbons and asphaltics. Therefore, plugging of asphaltics in reservoir rocks and a consequent reduction in injectivity and recovery may result when CO2 only is used in enhanced oil recovery. By adding common solvents as chemical modifiers, the flooding fluid shows marked improvement in solvency for heavy components of crudes due to its increased density and polarity. Numerous supercritical CO2 fluid extractions of dolomite rock from the Grayburg Formation containing known amount of spiked McElroy crude oil have been carried out to evaluate extraction efficiencies of CO2 and CO2 with chemical modifiers at various temperatures and pressures. All experiments show that extraction efficiency increases with increasing CO2 pressure but decreases with increasing temperature. Addition of chemical modifiers to CO2 also shows improved extraction efficiency and reduced asphaltic deposits. Under the pressure and temperature similar to McElroy reservoir conditions; chemically modified CO2 yielded almost 3 times as much oil extracts as those in extractions with CO2 only. It also reduced the asphaltics content in extracted rocks to nearly one half; indicating its potential for mitigating asphaltics plugging of formation rocks (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All. rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据