4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Nursing home costs and risk-adjusted outcome measures of quality

期刊

MEDICAL CARE
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 78-89

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200001000-00009

关键词

nursing homes; cost functions; quality of care; risk-adjusted outcomes

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG15965] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG015965] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. The inadequacy of quality of care in nursing homes has been and continues to be a focus of public concerns. Understanding the relationship between quality and costs can offer guidance to policies designed to encourage high quality. OBJECTIVES. TO investigate the relationship between costs and quality of care in nursing homes, and to test the hypothesis that higher quality may be associated with lower casts. RESEARCH DESIGN. Statistical regression techniques were used to estimate nursing home variable-cost functions that included three risk-adjusted outcome measures of quality. Quality measures were based on decline in functional status, worsening pressure ulcers, and mortality. The study hypothesis was tested by an F test for the exclusion of nonlinear quality variables in the cost functions. SUBJECTS. The study included 525 freestanding private and public nursing homes in New York State, or 84% of all nursing homes in the state during 1991. RESULTS. F tests rejected the hypotheses that the three quality measures could be excluded from the cost function and that the association between costs and quality was linear. An inverted U-shaped relationship between quality and costs suggests that there are quality regimens in which higher quality is associated with lower costs. CONCLUSIONS. Policies that encourage research to identify care protocols and management strategies leading to better outcomes and lower costs, as well as policies that encourage dissemination of such practices, may prevent decline in quality despite the continued financial constraints faced by nursing homes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据