4.4 Article

The surface flora of bacterial smear-ripened cheeses from cow's and goat's milk

期刊

INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL
卷 11, 期 4-7, 页码 307-314

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0958-6946(01)00060-7

关键词

smear cheeses; Tilsit; Chaumes; Staphylococcus; Brevibacterium; Corynebacterium; Arthrobacter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Debaryomyces vees hansenii was found to be the predominant yeast in all stages of ripening in several studies on semi-hard Tilsit cheese, soft Chaumes cheese and semi-hard goat's cheese. 75-95% of the bacterial flora was made up of coryneform bacteria. Brevibacterium linens was found at 0-15%. Yellow pigmented coryneform isolates (1-30%) belonged to Arthrobacter nicotianae. Non pathogenic staphylococci (mainly Staphylococcus equorum) were found at 5-15% of the total flora. Model systems were used to study the microbial interactions for growth, colour and aroma development within the surface flora to be able to formulate a defined starter culture. Commercially available surface starters do not reflect the microbial composition of the cheese surface. Too much emphasis is put on B. linens because of the orange pigmentation. New results showed that the red-brown or orange pigments are most likely due to the yellow pigmented Arthrobacter sp. in the surface flora. The mechanisms of developing the different shades of red are not yet understood. B. linens may be more important for aroma development, due to a highly efficient sulfur metabolism which also affects colour development. The importance of commercial S, xylosus is not clear since S. equorum was predominant instead, on all cheese varieties analysed. Brines were determined to be a natural reservoir for salt-tolerant S. equorum. The successful use of a defined 5-strain starter (D. hansenii, B. linens, A. nicotianae, Corynebacterium ammoniagenes and S. sciuri) for Tilsit cheese ripening was demonstrated on a 10 kg scale. Further improvement is currently being tested within an EU funded project. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据