3.8 Article

Inflammatory mediators in umbilical plasma from neonates who develop early-onset sepsis

期刊

BIOLOGY OF THE NEONATE
卷 80, 期 1, 页码 41-47

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000047118

关键词

umbilical plasma; cytokines; term and preterm neonates; sepsis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To study whether early-onset neonatal sepsis is associated with a prenatal immune response with elevated umbilical plasma levels of inflammatory mediators, and to study whether mediator levels may be helpful in identifying infected neonates. Setting: Nested case-control study. Methods: Cord blood was sampled from 7,073 consecutively delivered neonates. After review of the medical records, neonates suspected to suffer from infection were classified as infected (n = 52) or noninfected but sick controls (n = 33). We also included a group of healthy controls (n = 99). Umbilical plasma levels of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha), interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, soluble TNF receptors (p55 and p75), IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) and C-reactive protein were measured by immunoassays. Results: Infected neonates had higher levels of TNF alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, p55, p75 and IL-1RA than healthy controls (all p < 0.01). Among preterm infants (GA < 37 weeks), those with infection (n = 11) had higher levels of IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, p55 and p75 than noninfected sick controls (n = 13) (all p < 0.05), but among term infants, the infected did not differ from the noninfected sick controls. Receiver operator characteristic plots showed that IL-1 beta, IL-6 and IL-8 identified preterm infected neonates accurately. Conclusions: Early-onset neonatal sepsis is associated with a prenatal immune response with increased TNF alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, p55, p75 and IL-1RA levels in umbilical plasma. Among neonates who present symptoms suggestive of infection, cytokine levels may be helpful in identifying preterm, but not term infected individuals. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据