4.5 Article

Centrifugally-spun polyhydroxybutyrate fibres: Effect of process solvent on structure, morphology and cell response

期刊

出版社

VSP BV
DOI: 10.1163/156856201750180843

关键词

poly(beta-hydroxybutyrate); centrifugally-spun fibres; hydrolytic degradation; cell adhesion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structure and morphology of a novel form of poly(B-hydroxybutyrate) produced by gel-spinning is described. The entangled fibrous nature of the material, which resembles 'cotton wool' suggests possible functions in wound scaffolding devices. The surface structure and fibre: diameter distribution of the fibres have been investigated using phase contrast and scanning electron microscopy. Fibres were found to possess a variety of surface irregularities, such as pores and indentations, with diameters mainly in the range 1-15 mum. Additionally, individual fibres were occasionally found to be fused or forked together with neighbours. The effects of blending with various polysaccharides and of altering the process solvent on fibre morphology were also investigated. Under hydrolytic degradation conditions (pH 10.6, 70 degreesC) the fibres degraded by gradual fragmentation and erosion to fibre fragments, particulate matter acid eventually to monomer. Altering the production process influenced both the fibre diameter distributions and surface morphology of the constituent fibres. Mammalian and human epithelial cells were used to study the cellular interaction with the spun fibres. SEM studies show that then is little or no cell adhesion to the unmodified fibres, but surface treatment by means of acid and alkali washes promoted cell proliferation on the materials, probably as a result of the introduction of hydroxyl and carboxyl at the surface. Fabrication of non-woven mate, which were subsequently acid or alkali treated, provided a conventional way of forming a cell-adhesive matrix which may have potential value as a wound scaffold. Neither cell line exhibited any cytotoxic response to these polymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据