3.8 Article

Wavefunctions derived from experiment. II. A wavefunction for oxalic acid dihydrate

期刊

ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION A
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 87-100

出版社

MUNKSGAARD INT PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.1107/S0108767300013167

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A wavefunction has been derived for the oxalic acid dihydrate molecule using accurate low-temperature X-ray electron-density structure-factor data. The electron density from this constrained theoretical wavefunction is compared to those of unconstrained theoretical wavefunctions. Fitted electron densities around hydrogen atoms show significant deviation compared to Hartree-Fock calculations. In particular, hydrogen bonding appears enhanced in the crystal over theoretical predictions, while the density usually attributed to lone-pair electrons of the oxalic acid oxygen atoms is decreased. The constrained fitting procedure improves the overall agreement of the calculated structure factors even for structure factors that were not used as input to the fitting procedure. The pictures obtained from the constrained fitting procedure are insensitive to random errors introduced into the data. Similarly, the fitting procedure is able to reproduce features that arise from more accurate theoretical calculations. However, we are unable to fit our wavefunction to within the experimentally quoted error bounds without allowing an unreasonably large change in the energy of the constrained wavefunction. Large Hartree-Fock and density functional theory (DFT) cluster calculations involving up to 86 atoms in size also do not show significantly improved agreement with the experimentally observed structure factors. Derived properties from the constrained wavefunction fragments, such as the kinetic energy, electrostatic potential and the electron localization function, are also presented. In general, there are no difficulties in extracting experimental wavefunctions and the associated derived properties from elastic X-ray scattering data for crystal fragments of the order of 20 atoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据