4.1 Article

Genetic structure and differentiation of wild and domesticated populations of Capsicum annuum (Solanaceae) from Mexico

期刊

PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 226, 期 3-4, 页码 129-142

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s006060170061

关键词

Capsicum annum; Solanaceae; population genetics; genetic differentiation; domestication

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic variation and structure of ten wild, three domesticated and one wild-cultivated populations of pepper (Capsicum annuum) from northwestern Mexico were studied in order to find out if the domestication process has reduced the genetic variation of the modern cultivars of this species. The analysis was based on 12 polymorphic loci from nine isozymes. Wild populations were sampled in different habitats along a latitudinal gradient of ca. 500 km. All populations had high genetic variation (i.e. wild: A=2.72, P= 90.8%, He=0.445; wild-cultivated: A=2.50, P= 92.3%, He=0.461; domesticated: A=2.60, P=84.6%, He = 0.408), indicating little genetic erosion in modern cultivars of pepper. Genetic diversity estimated by Nei's method showed that most genetic variation is found within, rather than among populations. However, genetic differentiation is greater among cultivated (G(ST)=0.167) than among wild (G(ST)=0.056) populations. Wild populations had an average genetic identity (I) of 0.952, indicating little differentiation and high gene flow (Nm=4.21) among these populations. Average genetic identity between wild and domesticated populations was of I=0.818, revealing that the domestication process has modified the genetic composition of commercial varieties of pepper. Changes in genetic composition among commercial varieties seem to have occurred in different directions, as indicated by the average value of I=0.817 among these populations. The high level of diversity found in wild populations of C. annum? suggests that the wild relatives of cultivated peppers are a valuable genetic resource which must be conserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据