3.9 Article Proceedings Paper

Bisphosphonate-induced, hemichannel-mediated, anti-apoptosis through the Src/ERK pathway: A gap junction-independent action of connexin43

期刊

CELL COMMUNICATION AND ADHESION
卷 8, 期 4-6, 页码 377-+

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/15419060109080757

关键词

apoptosis; bisphosphonates; bone; connexin43; ERKs; Src

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [K02-AR02127, R29-AR43453] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [P01-AG13918] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [K02AR002127, R29AR043453] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P01AG013918] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Preservation of the mechanosensory function of osteocytes by inhibiting their apoptosis might contribute to the beneficial effects of bisphosphonates in bone. We report herein a mechanism by which connexin43 hemichannel opening by bisphosphonates triggers the activation of the kinases Src and ERKs and promotes cell survival. Bisphosphonate-induced anti-apoptosis requires connexin channel integrity, but not gap junctions. Osteocytic cells express functional hemichannels that are opened by bisphosphonates. as demonstrated by dye uptake, regulation by established agonists and antagonists, and cell surface biotinylation. The anti-apoptotic effect of bisphosphonates depends on connexin43 expression in mouse embryonic fibroblasts and osteoblastic cells. Transfection of connexin43, but not other connexins, into connexin43 naive cells confers do novo responsiveness to the drugs. The signal transducing property of connexin43 requires the pore-forming, as well as the C-terminal domains of the protein. the interaction of connexin43 with Src, and the activation of both Src and ERK kinases. These studies establish a role for connexin43 hemichannels in bisphosphonate action. and a novel function of connexin43-beyond gap junction communication-in the regulation of survival signaling pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据