4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Hormesis: A generalizable and unifying hypothesis

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY
卷 31, 期 4-5, 页码 353-424

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/20014091111730

关键词

hormesis; overcompensation; biphasic; adaptation; homeostasis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present article represents a comprehensive effort to assess the hypothesis that hormesis is a highly generalizable biological phenomenon independent of environmental stressor, biological endpoint, and experimental model system. The evaluative methodology and complementary approaches employed to assess this question are (1) evolutionary biology-based theoretical paradigm; (2) evaluation of > 20,000 toxicology articles using a priori entry and evaluative criteria; (3) evaluation of 17 large-scale studies each providing data on numerous agents tested in the same experimental model by the same research team; (4) the assimilation of experimental pharmacological data on 24 receptor systems in which biphasic dose responses have been established reproducibly along with hormetic mechanism elucidation; and (5) assessment of the original hormesis database with 1600 dose-response relationships demonstrating evidence consistent with the hormesis hypothesis. The complementary approaches for assessing hormesis provided strong support for its credibility as a central biological theory based on its high frequency of occurrence and quantitative features of expression within microbe, plant, and invertebrate and vertebrate animal systems. The findings suggest that hormetic effects represent evolutionary-based adaptive responses to environmentally induced disruptions in homeostasis. Such adaptive responses, which are incorporated into organismal integrative physiological systems and now clarified at the mechanistic level for more than two dozen receptor systems, provide a cogent basis for the application of hormetic mechanisms in the elucidation of fundamental evolutionary-based biological processes and in the development of novel clinical modalities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据