4.6 Article

Mesoporous Silicas as Versatile Supports to Tune the Palladium-Catalyzed Selective Aerobic Oxidation of Allylic Alcohols

期刊

CHEMCATCHEM
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 939-950

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201200301

关键词

heterogeneous catalysis; mesoporous materials; nanoparticles; palladium; selective oxidation

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/E046754/1, EP/G007594/2, EP/F01919X/1]
  2. ESRF [CH2432]
  3. Royal Society
  4. Leeds EPSRC Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Research Equipment Facility (LENNF) [EP/F056311/1]
  5. EPSRC [EP/F009488/1, EP/G007594/2, EP/E046754/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G007594/2, EP/F009488/1, EP/E046754/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surfactant templating offers a simple route to synthesize high-surface area silicas with ordered, tunable mesopore architectures. The use of these materials as versatile catalyst supports for palladium nanoparticles has been explored in the aerobic selective oxidation (selox) of allylic alcohols under mild conditions. Families of Pd/mesoporous silicas, synthesized through incipient wetness impregnation of SBA-15, SBA-16, and KIT-6, have been characterized by using nitrogen porosimetry, CO chemisorption, diffuse reflection infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and high-resolution TEM and benchmarked in liquid phase allylic alcohol selox against a Pd/amorphous SiO2 standard. The transition from amorphous to two-dimensional parallel and three-dimensional interpenetrating porous silica networks conferred significant selox rate enhancements associated with higher surface densities of active palladium oxide sites. Dissolved oxygen was essential for insitu stabilization of palladium oxide, and thus maintenance of high activity on-stream, whereas selectivity to the desired aldehyde selox product over competing hydrogenolysis pathways was directed by using palladium metal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据