4.5 Review

Cell death mechanisms in neurodegeneration

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2001.tb00134.x

关键词

programmed cell death; apoptosis; necrosis; neurodegeneration; Alzheimer's disease; Parkinson's disease; caspases; cytoskeletal pathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Progressive cell loss in specific neuronal populations often associated with typical cytoskeletal protein aggregations is a patholocical hallmark of neurodegenerative disorders, but the nature, time course and molecular causes of cell death and their relation to cytoskeletal pathologies are still unresolved. Apoptosis or alternative pathways of cell death have been discussed in Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Apoptotic DNA fragmentation in human brain as a sign of neuronal injury is found too frequent as to account for continous neuron loss in these slowly progressive processes. Morphological studies revealed extremely rare apoptotic neuronal death in Alzheimer's disease but yielded mixed results for Parkinson's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Based on recent data in human brain, as well as in animal and cell culture models, a picture is beginning to emerge suggesting that, in addition to apoptosis, other forms of programmed cell death may participate in neurodegeneration. Better understanding of the molecular players will further elucidate the mechanisms of cell death in these disorders and their relations to cytoskeletal abnormalities. Susceptible cell populations in a proapoptotic environment show increased vulnerability towards multiple noxious factors discussed in the pathogenesis of neurodegeneration. In conclusion, although many in vivo and in vitro data are in favor of apoptosis involvement in neurodegenerative processes, there is considerable evidence that very complex events may contribute to neuronal death with possible repair mechanisms, the elucidation of which may prove useful for future prevention and therapy of neurodegenerative disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据