期刊
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
卷 108, 期 1, 页码 96-112出版社
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.96
关键词
-
资金
- NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH038357] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
- NIMH NIH HHS [MH 38357] Funding Source: Medline
Three mathematical models of choice-the contextual-choice model (R. Grace, 1994), delay-reduction theory (N. Squires & E. Fantino, 1971). and a new model called the hyperbolic value-added model-were compared in their ability to predict the results from a wide variety of experiments with animal subjects. When supplied with 2 or 3 free parameters, all 3 models made fairly accurate predictions for a large set of experiments that used concurrent-chain procedures. One advantage of the hyperbolic value-added model is that it is derived from a simpler model that makes accurate predictions for many experiments using discrete-trial adjusting-delay procedures. Some results favor the hyperbolic value-added model and delay-reduction theory over the contextual-choice model, but more data are needed from choice situations For which the models make distinctly different predictions.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据