4.6 Article

The effect of paroxetine on 5-HT2A receptors in depression: An [F-18]setoperone PET imaging study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 158, 期 1, 页码 78-85

出版社

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.1.78

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: In the cortex of animals, serotonin (5-HT) levels increase after several weeks of treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Studies using an intrasubject design to examine the effects of SSRI treatment on 5-HT2A receptors in the cortex of drug-free depressed patients are needed. In theory, agonist stimulation of 5-HT2A receptors could be relevant to SSRI treatment by promoting neuronal growth and survival as well as direct elevation of mood. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of 6 weeks of paroxetine treatment on 5-HT2A receptors in depressed patients. Method: After a medication-free period of at least 3 months, 19 depressed patients were treated for 6 weeks with paroxetine, 20 mg/day. The authors used [F-18]setoperone and positron emission tomography to assess 5-HT2A receptor binding potential in the patients before and after treatment and in 19 age-matched healthy subjects. Results: 5-HT2A binding potential declined with age in all cortical regions in the depressed and healthy subjects. There was a significant interaction between age and treatment effect on 5-HT2A binding potential in all cortical regions. Subjects aged 20 to 30 years had a 10% decrease in 5-HT2A binding potential after treatment, whereas subjects aged 30 to 40 had no change. No regional differences in 5-HT2A binding potential between depressed and healthy subjects were found. Conclusions: 5-HT2A receptors downregulate in young depressed subjects after treatment with paroxetine, but this down-regulation attenuates with age. This suggests that over 6 weeks paroxetine treatment increases 5-HT agonism on 5-HT2A receptors in the cortex of young patients with depression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据