4.7 Article

Monitoring of PM10 and PM2.5 around primary particulate anthropogenic emission sources

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 845-858

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00387-3

关键词

atmospheric particles; PM10; PM2.5; ceramic emissions; ambient air quality monitoring; primary particles; Mediterranean basin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Investigations on the monitoring of ambient air levels of atmospheric particulates: were developed around a large source of primary anthropogenic particulate emissions: the industrial ceramic area in the province of Castello (Eastern Spain). Although these primary particulate emissions have a coarse grain-size distribution, the atmospheric transport dominated by the breeze circulation accounts for a grain-size segregation, which results in ambient air particles occurring mainly in the 2.5-10 mum range. The chemical composition of the ceramic particulate emissions is very similar to the crustal end-member but the use of high Al, Ti and Fe as tracer elements as well as a peculiar grain-size distribution in the insoluble major phases allow us to identify the ceramic input in the bulk particulate matter. PM2.5 instead of PM10 monitoring may avoid the interference of crustal particles without a major reduction in the secondary anthropogenic load, with the exception of nitrate. However, a methodology based in PM2.5 measurement alone is not adequate for monitoring the impact of primary particulate emissions (such as ceramic emissions) on air quality. since the major ambient air particles derived from these emissions are mainly in the range of 2.5-10 mum. Consequently. in areas characterised by major secondary particulate emissions. PM2.5 monitoring should detect anthropogenic particulate pollutants without crustal particulate interference, whereas PM10 measurements should be used in areas with major primary anthropogenic particulate emissions. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据