4.7 Article

Analysis of intracellular cytokines in CD4(+) and CD8(+) lung and blood T cells in sarcoidosis

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.1.9906071

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In pulmonary sarcoidosis, activated T cells accumulate in the lungs. We hypothesized that the balance between the T-helper type 1 (Th1) cytokines (interferon [IFN]-gamma and interleukin [IL]-2) and Th2 cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 might explain differences in clinical outcome in pulmonary sarcoidosis, such as why patients of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type DR17 have a much better prognosis than those of other HLA types. Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and lymphocytes obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) from HLA-typed sarcoidosis patients, as well as PBL from healthy controls, were stimulated in vitro, fixed, and permeabilized with saponin. Thereafter, cells were stained with fluorescence-labeled antibodies specific for intracellular cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IFN-gamma, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and cell surface markers CD4 and CD8, and were subjected to flow-cytometric analysis. In bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), there were significantly greater frequencies of T cells positive for IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha than there were among PBL, and significantly fewer cells positive for IL-4, in both the CD4(+) and CD8(+) subsets. HLA-DR17-positive patients showed a tendency toward a less pronounced Th1 response that may be related to their good prognosis. Sarcoidosis patients had higher frequencies of cells positive for IFN-gamma, IL-4, and IL-2 in their blood than did healthy controls, a finding that may reflect the systemic nature of sarcoidosis. A clear Th 1 cytokine profile of CD4(+) as well as of CD8(+) T cells was demonstrated in BALF from sarcoidosis patients. This was most pronounced for CD8(+) cells, which may therefore make an important contribution to the inflammatory process in the lungs in pulmonary sarcoidosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据