4.8 Article

EBNA1-specific CD4+ T cells in healthy carriers of Epstein-Barr virus are primarily Th1 in function

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 107, 期 1, 页码 121-130

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI10209

关键词

-

资金

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [K12HD000850] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R37AI040045, R01AI040874, R56AI040045, R01AI040045] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI040874, AI40874, AI40045, N01AI40045] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NICHD NIH HHS [K12 HD000850] Funding Source: Medline
  5. BHP HRSA HHS [K12-DH00850] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigen-1 (EBNA1) maintains the viral episome in all host cells infected with EBV. Recently, EBNA1 was found to be the main EBV latency antigen for CD4(+) T cells and could be recognized in cultures from all donors tested. We now identify a polarized Th1 phenotype and obtain evidence for its presence in vivo. When T cells were stimulated with dendritic cells infected with vaccinia vectors expressing EBNA1, 18 of 19 donors secreted IFN-gamma, whereas only two of 19 secreted IL-4. Magnetic selection was then used to isolate cells from fresh blood based on EBNA1-induced cytokine production. Specific IFN-gamma CD4(+) cell lines were established from six of six donors and IL-4 lines from three of six. Only the Th1 lines specifically lysed targets expressing three different sources of EBNA1 protein. When the IgG isotype of EBNA1 plasma Ab's was tested, most specific Ah's were IgG1 and of a high titer, confirming a Th1 response to EBNA1 in vivo. Ab's to other microbial antigens generally were not skewed toward IgG1. Given emerging evidence that Th1 CD4(+) T cells have several critical roles in host defense to viral infection and tumors, we propose that EBNA1-specific CD4(+) Th1 cells contribute to resistance to EBV and EBV-associated malignancies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据