4.6 Article

Relationship between interindividual differences in nicotine metabolism and CYP2A6 genetic polymorphism in humans

期刊

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 69, 期 1, 页码 72-78

出版社

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2001.112688

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Nicotine is mainly metabolized to cotinine by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2A6. Previously, we found that the CYP2A6 gene was deleted homozygously in one subject who was deficient in cotinine formation from nicotine. Objective: Our objective was to clarify the relationship between interindividual differences in nicotine metabolism and CYP2A6 genetic polymorphism. Methods: Nicotine was administered to 92 healthy Japanese subjects in the form of 1 piece of nicotine gum to investigate the potency of nicotine metabolism. The cotinine-nicotine ratio of the plasma concentration 2 hours after chewing was calculated as an index of nicotine metabolism. The genotypes of CYP2A6 gene, CYP2A6*1A, CYP2A6*1B, CYP2A6*2, CYP2A6*3, CYP2A6*4, and CYP2A6*5, were determined with polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Results: A large interindividual difference in nicotine metabolism was observed. Allele frequencies of CYP2A6*1A, CYP2A6*1B, and CYP2A6*4 were 42.4%, 37.5%, and 20.1%, respectively. The CYP2A6*2, CYP2A6*3, and CYP2A6*5 alleles were not found. Three subjects genotyped as CYP2A6*4/CYP2A6*4 were completely deficient in cotinine formation. The heterozygotes of the CYP2A6*4 allele tend to show lower capacities for cotinine formation. The subjects with CY2A6*1A/CY2A61B appeared to have higher capacities of cotinine formation than subjects with CY2A6*1/CYP2A6*1A, although the difference was not significant. The probit plot of the cotinine-nicotine ratio was not linear; this possibly indicated the existence of a novel mutation in the CYP2A6 gene genotyped as CYP2A6*1B/CYP2A6*4. Conclusions: The relationship between interindividual differences in nicotine metabolism and CYP2A6 genetic polymorphism in humans was proved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据