4.5 Article

Coordinated expression of muscarinic receptor messenger RNAs in striatal medium spiny neurons

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 103, 期 4, 页码 1017-1024

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00039-2

关键词

striatum; single-cell RT-PCR; substance P; enkephalin; M1 receptor; M4 receptor

资金

  1. DS NIH HHS [NINDS 34696] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The postsynaptic effects of acetylcholine in the striatum are largely mediated by muscarinic receptors. Two of the five cloned muscarinic receptors (M1 and M4) are expressed at high levels by the medium spiny neurons-the principal projection neurons of the striatum. Previous studies have suggested that M4 muscarinic receptors are found primarily in medium spiny neurons that express substance P and participate in the direct striatonigral pathway. This view is difficult to reconcile with electrophysiological studies suggesting that nearly all medium spiny neurons exhibit responses characteristic of M4 receptors. To explore this apparent discrepancy, the coordinated expression of M1-M5 receptor messenger RNAs in identified medium spiny neurons was assayed using single-cell reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction techniques. Nearly all medium spiny neurons had detectable levels of M1 receptor messenger RNA. Although M4 receptor messenger RNA was detected more frequently in substance P-expressing neurons (70%), it was readily seen in a substantial population of enkephalin-expressing neurons (50%). To provide a quantitative estimate of transcript abundance, quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction experiments were performed. These studies revealed that M4 messenger RNA was expressed by both substance P and enkephalin neurons, but was roughly five-fold higher in abundance in substance P-expressing neurons. This quantitative difference provides a means of reconciling previous estimates of M4 receptor distribution and function. (C) 2001 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd on behalf of IBRO.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据