4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Degradation of carrier lifetime in Cz silicon solar cells

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
卷 65, 期 1-4, 页码 219-229

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0927-0248(00)00098-2

关键词

solar cells; Czochralski silicon; degradation; carrier lifetime; defects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lifetime degradation induced by light illumination or carrier injection which is observed in Czochralski-grown silicon (Cz-Si) leads to a significant decrease of solar cell efficiency. Thus, the reduction of this effect has a high potential for the improvement of Ct-Si solar cells. In the present work both, the analysis of the underlying defect and its technological reduction are discussed. A clear correlation of the ct specific metastable defect with the oxygen and boron concentration in Ct-Si has been observed. Especially, recently performed lifetime measurements on oxygen-free boron-doped p-type MCz silicon and gallium-doped oxygen-contaminated Ct-silicon, both of which show no degradation, confirm this hypothesis. While the quantitative correlation between the defect concentration and boron is linear, the increase of the defect concentration induced by the interstitial oxygen concentration is superlinear, i.e. it follows a potential law of power approximately 5. Beyond the defect analysis, two different ways to reduce the metastable defect concentration are discussed. A proper material choice by substituting or reducing one of the major components of the metastable defect can completely avoid the degradation effect. The excellent performance of oxygen-free MCz-Si and gallium-doped Ct-Si is reflected in the achieved record efficiencies of 22.7% and 22.5%, respectively. In standard boron-doped oxygen-contaminated p-type Ct-Si a strong reduction of the metastable defect concentration can be achieved by a high-temperature process step resulting in an improvement of the stable bulk lifetime by a factor of 2-4. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据