4.5 Article

Identification of bioactive peptide from Oreochromis niloticus skin gelatin

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 1222-1229

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-015-2091-x

关键词

Bioactive peptide; ACE inhibition; Nile tilapia; Angiotensin-I converting enzyme; Gelatin

资金

  1. National Research Council of Thailand
  2. Graduate School of Chiang Mai University
  3. Faculty of Science Publication Boosting Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fish skin, one type of wastes generated from Nile tilapia processing, is still a good source of collagen and gelatin. Bioactive peptides can be obtained from Nile tilapia skin gelatin by trypsin digestion. Trypsin hydrolysate was subsequently purified by gel filtration chromatography. Trypsin A fraction showed the greatest reducing power (5.138 +/- A 1.060 mu M trolox/mg peptide) among all hydrolysate fractions, while trypsin B fraction from gel filtration column was found to exhibit the best radical scavenging and angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activities 8.16 +/- A 2.18 mu g trolox/mg peptide and 59.32 +/- A 9.97 % inhibition, respectively. The most active fraction was subjected to MALDI-TOF/TOF MS/MS. After annotation by Mascot sequence matching software (Matrix Science) with Ludwig NR Database, two peptide sequences were identified; GPEGPAGAR (MW 810.87 Da) and GETGPAGPAGAAGPAGPR (MW 1490.61 Da). The docking analysis suggested that the shape of the shorter peptide may be slightly more proper, to fit into the binding cleft of the ACE. However, the binding affinities calculated from the docking showed no significant difference between the two peptides. In good agreement with the in silico data, results from the in vitro ACE inhibitory activity with synthetic peptides also showed no significant difference. Both peptides are thus interesting novel candidates suitable for further development as ACE inhibitory and antioxidant agents from the natural source.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据