4.5 Article

Maternal depression and comorbidity: Predicting early parenting, attachment security, and toddler social-emotional problems and competencies

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004583-200101000-00012

关键词

maternal depression; infancy; attachment; problem behaviors; competencies

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R03MH049684] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH 49684] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine relations between maternal depression tin pure and comorbid forms) and mother-infant interactions, infant attachment, and toddler social-emotional problems and competencies. A second objective was to explore sex differences. Method: Sixty-nine mother-infant dyads were followed from pregnancy to 30 months postpartum. Depression was measured at multiple times with self-report and interview assessments. Play was assessed at 4 months and attachment status at 14 months postpartum. At 30 months, mothers completed the Child Behavior Checklist and Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment. Results: Lifetime maternal depression predicted less optimal mother-infant interactions and insecure infant attachment. However, this depression effect was accounted for by mothers with comorbid diagnoses, who had less optimal interactions, and infants with higher rates of insecurity than either mothers with depression only or mothers with no psychopathology. Prenatal and postpartum depressive symptoms were associated with problem behaviors and lower competencies for boys. In contrast, quality of early interactions predicted problem behaviors in girls. Conclusions: It is important to examine the context of maternal depression with respect to additional psychopathology and environmental risks. Maternal depression in the presence of other psychopathology confers risk to the mother-child dyad. Consistent with previous work, risk pathways appear to differ for boys and girls. Early identification and prevention efforts are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据