4.6 Article

Biochemical and morphogenic effects of the interaction between protein kinase C-epsilon and actin in vitro and in cultured NIH3T3 cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 83, 期 4, 页码 532-546

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.1246

关键词

protein kinase C; actin; polymerization; critical concentration; thymosin beta(4); latrunculin beta

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [R01ES008397] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES8397] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein kinase C-epsilon coordinately regulates changes in cell growth and shape. Cells overproducing protein kinase C-epsilon spontaneously acquire a polarized morphology and extend long cellular membrane protrusions that are reminiscent of the morphology observed in ras-transformed fibroblasts. Here we report that the regulatory Cl domain contains an actin binding hexapeptide motif that is essential for the morphogenic effects of protein kinase C-epsilon in cultured NIH3T3 murine fibroblasts. The extension of elongate processes by protein kinase C-epsilon transformed fibroblasts appeared to be driven by a kinase-independent mechanism that required organized networks of both actin and microtubules. Flow cytometry of phalloidin-stained cells demonstrated that protein kinase C-epsilon significantly increased the cellular content of polymerized actin in NIH3T3 cells. Studies with a cell-free system suggest that protein kinase C-epsilon inhibits the in vitro disassembly of actin filaments, is capable of desequestering actin monomers from physiologically relevant concentrations of thymosin beta (4), and increases the rate of actin filament elongation by decreasing the critical concentration of actin. Based on these and other observations, it is proposed that protein kinase C-epsilon may function as a terminal downstream effector in at least one of the signaling pathways that mitogens engage to initiate outgrowth of cellular protrusions. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据