4.4 Article

Kv4.2 channels tagged in the S1-S2 loop for alpha-bungarotoxin binding provide a new tool for studies of channel expression and localization

期刊

CHANNELS
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 115-123

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/chan.4.2.10878

关键词

K(v)4.2; S1-S2 loop; alpha-bungarotoxin; trafficking; ion channel; mutagenesis

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM032629, GM32629, R01 GM032629-22] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the first successful insertion of an engineered, high-affinity alpha-bungarotoxin (Bgtx) binding site into a voltagegated ion channel, K(V)4.2, using a short, intra-protein embedded sequence (GGWRYYESSLEPYPDGG), derived from a previously described mimotope peptide, HAP. A major benefit to this approach is the ability to live-image the distribution and fate of functional channels on the plasma membrane surface. The Bgtx binding sequence was introduced into the putative extracellular loop between the S1 and S2 transmembrane domains of K(V)4.2. Following co-expression with KChIP3 in tsA201 cells, S1-S2 HAP-tagged channels express at levels comparable to wild-type K(V)4.2, and their activation and inactivation kinetics are minimally altered under most conditions. Binding assays, as well as live staining of surface-expressed K(V)4.2 channels with fluorescent-Bgtx, readily demonstrate specific binding of Bgtx to HAP-tagged K V 4.2 expressed on the surface of tsA201 cells. Similar live-imaging results were obtained with HAP-tagged K(V)4.2 transfected into hippocampal neurons in primary culture suggesting applicability for future in vivo studies. Furthermore, the activation kinetics of S1-S2-tagged K(V)4.2 channels are minimally affected by the binding of Bgtx, suggesting a limited role if any for the S1-S2 loop in voltage sensing or gating associated conformational changes. Successful functional insertion of the HAP sequence into the S1-S2 linker of K(V)4.2 suggests that other related channels may similarly be amenable to this tagging strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据